Reaching toward 'respondeo...'
Imagine an AI with all of ERH's lectures, writings, etc.
Program it to respond to questions.
(What is the ontology of a question, I wondered when a grad student, in response to what I remember as an excessive preoccupation by my betters with two red dots, side by side. 'What makes them two? They kept asking, I'm still recovering.)
And I'm still recovering from a decade+ of listening to all of ERH and JBJ (until that time), and lots of North, and Mount Olive... .
And I'm still recovering from a decade+ of listening to all of ERH and JBJ (until that time), and lots of North, and Mount Olive... .
Be that as it may, our descendants will have those AIs, and more 'respondeo'-ing will be able to be don.
Note: This was inspired by a couple of things. 1--My weakened fight for 'balance' occasioned by my every other week cranial-sacral treatment. 2--Reading the first few pages of Nickel's 'The Dance of Number' Here is the big takeaway so far. 1--The dance of number is a reflection of the perichoresis of the Trinity.
You see the connection. It'd help to compare Alfred Wallace.
No comments:
Post a Comment