50 years since my philosophy degree—still in recovery.TSOCHI49A
Page 2
Margery Watts was kind enough to post in Kristy Lonsdale’s
Stuart Herald that I had graduated from the U of Iowa on August 10, A. D. 1966
with a degree in philosophy. There are
two things to know about that. 1—Louise got me through. 2--I’m still in
recovery.
The rest of this will be a development on one key: Goedel’s
Incompleteness Proof in Symbolic Logic (Dr. Addis), especially his mention that
all 5 of the Russell-Whitehead operators in “Principia Mathematica’ can be
derived from the Sheffer Stroke, which
is ‘not both the one and the other’.
Goedel’s Incompleteness Proof, if I remember it correctly—I
memorized it at the time--says that any axiomatic system is incomplete. There are Well-Formed Formulas (truth
statements) that are well-formed and true, but which cannot be derived from the
axioms.
Thus, incompleteness. Scientists sometimes say that this is
true of scientific truth. Surely theologically, there is a big gap between the
Creator and us. We’ll get into inter-personal relations later—my imperative.
Many ‘new’ discoveries cast theological formulations in other forms, of course.
And the Sheffer? Let’s ring some changes on that. We know that the I Ching is based on an
unbroken line for yes, and a broken one for no.
Yin and Yang are an attempt at intermixture. The Urim and Thummim of the
High Priest in Ancient Israel are thought by some to be stones—one for yes, one
for no. Computer work is based on zero and one.
Surely there are more.
Now, with the Three Chief Symbols, the Logos-Made-Flesh is
said to be both the one and the other, without mixture, separation, confusion
or something else (division?), if I remember correctly. We’re talking Creeds of the Church here.
Logos in the Symbols, and Symbolic Logic—there’s a word play!
Then there is Rosenstock-Huessy (Rosenstock). A refugee from
Germany, he taught at Harvard, and better, at Dartmouth. His students recorded him, starting in the
1940s. He had much to do with the Peace Corps. See his entry in the Stanford
Encyclopedia of Philosophy. I listened to him, James Jordan, Gary North,
Teaching Company and other audios at work—what an education!
Rosenstock said that the Christian Era is when liabilities are
turned into assets. One becomes the other.
Also, ‘Peace is the explicit reconciliation of opposites,’
and ‘America will lose/is losing the ability to speak’ by which he meant true
speech, where one’s life is put behind one’s words (CHH: vows). ‘Every Latin
verb form is based on a shorter imperative stem’ (paraphrase: ‘Magna Carta
Latina’). Combining some of my own with ERH’s; The peacemaker is a hero,
Helping.Explicitly.Reconcile.Opposites. And American Social History can be seen
as the re-integration of the veteran into peacetime society, but we have lost
both war declaration, and thus peace.
His historical work states that the national revolutions of
the Christian Era are in 5 steps: Imperative, Subjective, Narrative, Objective,
and Planetary Service. Papal, German, English, American-French, and Russian.
And his big thrust of history is a chiasm, there and back
again. Tribes, Empires, Israel, Greece, and after He Who Reversed The Trend,
Greece became, not a social order but, a companion. The New Israel is the
church without exclusion, the Nation-State became the Empires minus slavery,
and we await the next 1000 years, however long they are, which will be small,
enthusiastic groups (tribes) without warfare—also, everything of that time will
be a word starting with ‘socio-‘.
Jordan sees history as successive emphases on the Father,
and then the Son, and then the Holy Spirit. Tribes, Nations, Cosmopolitan
before Jesus, and Church, Christian State, and University after. (Law, Lyric,
Evaluation, Fact, New Torah).We now await, per ‘Through New Eyes,’ though
‘Crisis, Opportunity, and the Christian Future’ challenges us to be new
Abrahams, setting the course. ‘We are witnessing the end of Western
Civilization.’ So North: Who’s in charge?—the one anotherers of the earth
beneath. To whom do I report? What are the rules? What happens if I obey—or
don’t? Does this outfit have a future?
So, my work accepts incompleteness, but aims more toward
liabilities into assets, or as the New England Primer, the most-used textbook
in American History puts it: ‘What is the chief end of man? To glorify God and
fully to enjoy him forever’. (Full bucket)
Thus, I have an entry for the new era for each of
Rosenstock’s 5—which I claim, are secularly put for his academic audience. The
many 5s will be intros to each week, forward and backward. Start with ‘What
will your verse be?’ from Robin Williams in ‘Dead Poets Society’ on YouTube—that’s
where we’re going, the final cause. ‘You can’t teach about the Holy Spirit in
Sociology courses, Professor Rosenstock,‘ said Harvard, around 1935.
Mine can be found elsewhere, or you can email me at edencity@aol.com, or I’m Charles Howard
Hartman on Facebook. When I’m ready, a website.
Here’s a fill-in-the-blanks version of the imperative (JBJ’s
Call, North’s Transcendence): https://sites.google.com/site/thesymphonyofhistorytsochi/fill-in-the-blanks-version-opus-49-s-a-n-e-sing-a-new-era. The rest of mine can be found by searching “Better
Summary chuckhartmanhistoryconductor”
The key conclusion from what I’ve worked on for decades is
that the Godparents For Eldsters that is the #5 Planetary Service portion is to
be exponentialized into Godparents For Society—Persons, Types of Speech,
Institutions. (Levir glorified) See my #2. Pella, refuge given, could become
expert on refugees. Stuart, founded along the Big Mover—railroad—to serve
farmers, could serve urban and other farmers along the internet, our big mover.
Society: 1, Church—3rd world, greatest evangelistic success since
the 3rd century. 2, State—Creveld, university—see below. 3, Marriage—Spengler/Goodman
: ‘How Civilizations Die’
As Rosenstock put it, when we don’t take care of the
unfinished business of previous social orders, they come back worse than ever
(paraphrase). To do this exponentialization is to do that, I pray, while we
wait, thanking thinking, arguing with GodTrinity using His own words, as I’ve
attempted to do with this page that highlights
some of my previous 50 years, glorifyingly, Lord willing, and other things
being equal..
Love in King Jesus,
Charlie ‘With page 1-4 you could conduct your own symphony
and conductor training’ Hartman
PS: The Symphony Of Comprehensive History Interactive:
TSOCHI
PPS: Comprehensivity, since Goedel and Shroedinger. ‘Bare
particular’. Two red dots on a page, ‘Why are there two rather than one?’ More
Faulkner: ‘… I decline to accept the end of man. It is easy enough to say that
man is immortal simply because he will endure: that when the last dingdong of
doom has clanged and faded from the last worthless rock hanging tideless in the
last red and dying evening, that even then there will still be one more sound:
that of his puny inexhaustible voice, still talking. I refuse to accept this. I
believe that man will not merely endure: he will prevail…‘. Less Wittgenstein
(though more than ‘2 red dots’ and yes ‘language games’) : ‘Whereof one cannot
speak, thereof one must be silent.’. Even more ERH/Rosenstock ‘Chanting, how
men first cried out to God.’ (I remember some incomplete sentences at U of Iowa
philosophy).
PPPS: After Sputnik (1957) the federal government wanted to
encourage science, and passed the National Defense Education Act. I borrowed the maximum, $250 a SEMESTER, NOT
a semester HOUR, and ended up owing $1800 for the whole 4-year education.
Question: Do you want more doctors? Something similar would be better that many
alternatives. After now: University—www.uopeople.edu, 100% online, no tuition, accredited
and Khan Academy, and all MIT courses are free online (credit maybe later), and
I pray that TSOCHI will be made into an app played world-wide.
No comments:
Post a Comment